Menu Search Icon Mail Icon
Davis Saperstein & Salomon
Call Today 201-907-5000
No fee if no recovery
All consultations are free

Products Liability Newsletter

Workers' Compensation for Toxic Tort Claims

A “tort” is defined as behavior that harms an individual, but is not necessarily a criminal act. A toxic tort claim can be brought by an individual who was exposed to and harmed by a toxin due to the conduct of another.

Workers' Compensation and Toxic Torts
Workers' Compensation law compensates workers for harms suffered at work. This may include any one of numerous harmful toxins and substances possibly present, including:

  • Arsenic
  • Asbestos
  • Carbon Monoxide
  • Latex
  • Lead
  • Mercury
  • Toluene

Even if an employee has been exposed to a toxic substance, it must still be proven that the employer had a duty to protect employees from the toxin, and that the employer failed to do so.

Bringing Separate Toxic Tort Claims After Filing a Workers’ Compensation Claim
Workers’ compensation settlements usually relieve the employer from any further liability or obligation to the employee on their claim. Consequently, a toxic tort suit against the employer is typically barred, unless the employee wants to sue the employer for any non-physical injuries resulting from the harmful exposure.

However, a separate product liability lawsuit may be brought against any other individual or entity that may have had some blame in regards to the employee's injury, such as a manufacturer of the toxic substance.

Damages Available for the Victim of Toxic Tort Exposure
After proving a valid toxic tort claim, an injured employee may be able to collect damages such as:

  • Medical expenses
  • Necessary rehabilitation
  • Lost wages, including future lost wages
  • Emotional distress
  • Pain and suffering

  • Standards for Expert Testimony
    Authorities suggest that “lay” witnesses may testify to conclusions drawn from their own observations, while an “expert” expresses an opinion based on special knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education. The testimony... Read more.
  • Circumstantial Evidence in Product Liability Cases
    Individuals who have been injured by a defective product will have a valid legal claim against the manufacturer or distributor of the product if they can prove that the product was defective and that the product defect caused their... Read more.
  • Taking Unsafe Toys Away From Children
    The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) regulates the distribution of 15,000 types of consumer products that pose an unreasonable risk of injury or death to the public. As young children are particularly susceptible to... Read more.
  • The Problem With Recalled Seat Belts and Replacement
    Car manufacturers will voluntarily recall certain cars when faulty car parts cause injuries or death. Several manufacturers have recalled cars because of faulty seat belts and belt failures. Lawyers and consumer groups such as... Read more.
Law Commentary Legal News
Share This Page:
Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C., is located in Teaneck NJ and serves clients in and around Teaneck, Hackensack, Bergenfield, Tenafly, Englewood, New Milford, Palisades Park, Englewood Cliffs, Dumont, River Edge, Demarest, Haworth, Oradell, Leonia, Bogota, Maywood, Closter, Alpine, Emerson, Fort Lee, Ridgefield Park, Little Ferry, Bergen County, Hudson County and Passaic County.
Designed and Powered by NextClient

© 2026 Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. All rights reserved. Custom WebShop™ law firm website design by NextClient.com.